Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Synnax

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Merge and redirect to Planets in science fiction. Death phoenix 03:05, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Synnax

Imaginary and non-encyclopedic. GRider\^talk 20:08, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I think "mentioned" says it all. Wikipedia does not include everything mentioned in any book, whoever the author. Delete. -R. fiend 23:15, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Comment: I've rescued this from speedy deletion. The page does not appear to have passed through the VFD process correctly. It was never listed at WP:VFD according to the edit history, and so its nomination may not have been been seen by many editors. I've listed it here, now, in order to give the article a fair shot. My comments on this article are on record. Uncle G 07:48, 2005 Feb 13 (UTC)
Merge with List of fictional planets (not enough info to warrant its own article) Radiant! 10:55, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete, cruft. Wyss 11:16, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Merge with List of fictional planets or somewhere. Kappa 12:56, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Merge with List of fictional planets, and add redirect. Megan1967 01:15, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Do not merge. GRider\^talk 17:52, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
This and much of Category:Foundation universe planets could stand to be merged ~~together~~ into List of minor Foundation universe planets. I don't the minor ones there in general, and certainly not this one in particular, belong in List of fictional planets, if all they got was a "mention". —Korath (Talk) 02:42, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.