Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/God Save the Queen (parody)
Is this really necessary? -- Graham ☺ | Talk 03:21, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Mediocre verse by a nobody. Even if it were bya somebody it should be in wikisource, not here --AlainV 03:24, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete - stupid, non-encyclopedic. Cdc 04:15, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- That's the most offensive they got? Hmmmmm... B-. I'd like to see a bit more effort next time. Was a little lazy; lacked creativity. Gonna have to go with delete. -R. fiend 06:59, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Offensive and pointless. Down the toiletatory with it. Anthony Appleyard 09:33, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Don't seem to be much else to do than delete; that said, I find the original a bit more offensive at times. Shimgray 13:35, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Wonder why it not speedy delete. utcursch 13:47, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)
- Seems to be a speedy candidate to me as a user test. It seems to be a c&p from somewhere ("You clicked on this" and "If you read the edited version"). I'll wait, though, to see if anyone has dissent before acting upon it. It's just potty mouth. <shrug> It can't hold a candle to some of the really good insults of the past. Geogre 14:21, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Oops, I seem to have speedy deleted it by mistake. Does anyone want me to put it back? (Incidentally, I clicked on it expecting to see the Sex Pistols' version.) Deb 18:53, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Whoopsie-daisey! A "mistake" eh? heh heh heh. No, I don't think anyone will be clamouring to have that back anytime soon. We could probably use a few more "mistakes" at times too. -R. fiend 20:25, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Royally delete-worthy. Take care not to undelete it accidentally, Deb. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 20:29, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)