Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 April 3
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
April 3
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. --Kbdank71 16:32, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Voting results:
"Filipino people" (1): VivaEmilyDavies
"People of the Philippines" (1): Kbdank71
No consensus. Default is to keep.
Move to Category:Filipino people - not only would this be consistent with the vast majority of nationalities (see Category:People by nationality), this category has a subcategory for "Filipino Americans", indicating that it is actually used for Filipino people in a wider sense than simply citizens or inhabitants of the Philippines. --VivaEmilyDavies 03:31, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- See discussion at #Category:People of Foo and Category:People from Foo below.
Susvolans (pigs can fly) 12:58, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Agreed, makes sense to keep discussion there, but separate votes up here perhaps? This is slightly different in that it clearly has "Filipino Americans" as a subcat, indicating to me that it ought to be ambiguous between nationality and country.--VivaEmilyDavies 17:01, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. The naming conventions recommend using nouns instead of adjectives. -Kbdank71 13:40, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: Please read the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (adjectives) you quoted. "The naming conventions for adjectives is a naming convention for how to create Wikipedia pages about adjectives" so "At the current time, elegant redirects to elegance, democratic redirects to democracy, and adjectival redirects to adjective". That's about redirects of articles, in the article space, whose title is purely an adjective. The relevant policy would actually be Wikipedia:Naming conventions (country-specific topics) but that is still in "proposed" state. --VivaEmilyDavies 17:01, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.