Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Sandbox
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was invalid nomination. sjorford →•← 20:13, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Because I said sooooooooooooo and I belooooooooooong in the loooooooooony bin!
- Delete---BrenDJ 21:48, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Used for Wikipedia tests. What's wrong with the sandbox?? Georgia guy 21:52, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- chuckle I'm pretty sure someone was merely testing the sandbox. Or pulling a prank. Of course we don't want to delete it. (Note: The above comment was made by Baylink on 15:35, 5 Apr 2005)
- Keep since the VfD template was most likely put in here as a joke or just a test. Zscout370 18:49, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Cleanup this article is what, three years old, and is the constant target of vandals and blanking, etc. Perhaps a protection is in order here ... — Ilγαηερ (Tαlκ) 15:15, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: if this is placed into a protection mode, then all meaning full tests are gone. Plus, the bot comes in every 12 hours and fixes it, or unless the header has been toyed with. I do not mind going in and fixing things manually if things like the Weinnie Hut Jr's show up again. Zscout370 16:26, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Keep: Also, there should be a link to the test-wiki. Does that exist anymore? MessedRocker 23:25, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
- Merge with Main page, plenty of relevant content common to both pages. DrZoidberg 17:38, 19 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.