Talk:Deuterium

Chemicals Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elements: Isotopes Mid‑importance

	Chemistry portal This article is supported by WikiProject Elements, which gives a central approach to the chemical elements and their isotopes on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing this article, or visit the project page for more details.ElementsWikipedia:WikiProject ElementsTemplate:WikiProject Elementschemical elements
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Isotope Taskforce.

Physics Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 730 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Hyperfine transition

The article could make mention of the 327-MHz deuterium hyperfine transition, particularly in an astronomy context (Cf. hydrogen line).[1][2] Thanks. Praemonitus (talk) 22:24, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Standard Model Instability

It seems that in the standard model, the deuteron is not completely stable, but rather very long lived. t'Hooft writes at the bottom of page 3 "Thus, because of the Cabibbo rotation, a proton and a neutron (two baryons equal six quarks) may annihilate to form two antileptons, one of electron and one of muon type. The factors exp(- 16pi /g^2) = exp(- 4pi * 137 * sin theta_W)"^[1] This calculation is elaborated here: https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/288913/10991 to conclude a lifetime of 10^180 seconds.

References

^ t'Hooft, G (5 July 1976). "Symmetry Breaking through Bell-Jackiw Anomalies". PRL. 37 (1). Retrieved 30 May 2023.

Should Deuterium glow tube be used for lede image?

Would it make more sense for File:Deuterium discharage tube.jpg to be used as the lead image instead, or maybe along with, the isotope highlighted on the table of nuclides? After all, we don't just put images of elements highlighted on the periodic table for their lede sections. ✨ΩmegaMantis✨^blather 18:30, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{Infobox isotope}} does not seem to prescribe any standard for the image. Might be useful to ask Wikipedia:WikiProject Elements to coordinate this across the many such articles. DMacks (talk) 19:35, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Added the gas discharge tube photo for now, since the project seems to favor actual photos of elements, and someone else has already suggested it. Mrfoogles (talk) 17:47, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If there's any opposition this can go on the WikiProject talk page Mrfoogles (talk) 17:49, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Symbol

IUPAC recommends that the chemical symbol for deuterium should be ²H, rather than D. I strongly agree with that recommendation, for multiple reasons. This article should follow IUPAC's recommendation; for instance, writing ²H₂O rather than D₂O (see "Heavy water"). Solomonfromfinland (talk) 22:02, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Section "Data for molecular deuterium"

That section contains also data concerning atomic deuterium, and deuterium combined with other elements, such as HDO . This seems to contradict the heading of the section. Ekisbares (talk) 08:59, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

See the article, "Isotopes of hydrogen". In it, the section, "Hydrogen-2 (deuterium)", doesn't cite any sources. Please add some sources there. Solomonfromfinland (talk) 16:30, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] t'Hooft, G (5 July 1976). "Symmetry Breaking through Bell-Jackiw Anomalies". PRL. 37 (1). Retrieved 30 May 2023.

[1]