User talk:Orz

Orz, can you please point me to supporting information regarding your claim that W Bush was admitted to Harvard only due to his father's connections? I am unaware of these findings. - Tεx τ urε 17:45, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

To Texture:

Please refer to the Salon article from September 16, 2004 written by Yoshi Tsurumi, a former professor of George W. Bush at Harvard University. On the web, such information can be found at http://dogfight04.typepad.com/dogfight04/2004/09/bush_showing_hi.html. -- Orz

Robert Sapolsky

Orz: Why did you blank the section in Robert Sapolsky? I've reverted your edit until you can explain why this paragraph is false. Semiconscious · talk 10:14, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It has never been blanked. Read the log carefully. My modification was "Robert Sapolsky, a neuroendocrinologist, has focused his research on issues of stress and neuron degeneration" ---> "His research focuses on issues of stress and neuron degeneration". -- Orz 19:10, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

....yeah.... I see that now. Thus the perils of trying to edit at 3am. My apologies! Semiconscious · talk 20:02, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Mark Selbee. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! --Zoz (t) 17:15, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Learning. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JForget 22:20, 29 August 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Sorry disregard about the message then. --JForget 00:45, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Timestamp preservation

You added a new column File timestamp preservation to the Technical information section of Comparison of revision control software. Could you please add a corresponding entry to the Table explanations similarly to the other columns? I recently deleted [1] a similar column, because it had no clear explanation. Thank you.

I also believe the "Advanced Features" section would be more appropriate for this column. And there we wouldn't need dozens of unknown tags either. Agreed? --Drizzd (talk) 10:24, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Orz! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 34 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Richard Wolfson (physicist) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:27, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]