Talk:Spin (propaganda)
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Spin is older than the 90s
[edit]Spin has a huge history in political rhetoric, especially where a monarch is propped up by a religion or the willingness of their subjects to believe the enemy is evil and they are infallible. Consider expansion? Plus spin is still hugely prevalent, especially in Internet Activism. Trump frequently offers a different set of events than is the dominant narrative. The use of Alastair Campbell as a example may be too partisan and is frequently returned to despite being an Anglocentric example. Aquataris (talk) 15:45, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, this is the most politically biased wikipedia article I ever read, at least in english. Doesn't give any information (where does the term "spin doctor" come from?) but gives instead always the same family of politically biased examples. IMO it should be totally redone or removed; I can't imagine how it could be corrected to the usual wikipedia standards. Nachoseli (talk) 12:42, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
'cherry picking' does not need an image of a cherry
[edit]Want to remove - any objections? 92.11.194.9 (talk) 23:10, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class WikiProject Business articles
- High-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- Start-Class Marketing & Advertising articles
- High-importance Marketing & Advertising articles
- WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles
- Start-Class politics articles
- High-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Start-Class Media articles
- Unknown-importance Media articles
- WikiProject Media articles
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press