Jump to content

User talk:Vivacissamamente

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If every visitor here signed (please do), I would soon have a list of everyone who had visited my page recently!

Hi!

[edit]

Hi, and thanks for the edits per Talk:sigma-algebra. I sat down to do them this morning ... and imagine my surprise, the articles were not quite as I remembered them. For an old-timer, I note you've kept an low profile. The party is at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics. linas 14:36, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Talk

[edit]

You may be interested in Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines. Specifically, for future reference, Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#Layout: "Proceed descendingly: Within each topic, the further down the contribution to talk, the chronologically later it was made." Hyacinth 10:44, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply to my question re the Elusinian Mysteries. Tony Boulton 25/7/2006

Angela Beesley

[edit]

nominated for deletion. --Coroebus 16:16, 7 October 2006 (UTC) you are stupid![reply]

just a note

[edit]

it's spelled "vivacissimamente" in italian.

Yeah, I've known for a few years now, but I think that makes it kind of appropriate.
Thanks.

AfD nomination of List of atonal pieces

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of atonal pieces, has been listed by me for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of atonal pieces. Thank you. S.dedalus 00:17, 5 April 2007 (UTC)I'm a total dork.[reply]

Concur

[edit]

I concur with your deletion of the text that "thought-terminating cliche is an example of itself." I had also read that and scratched my head. If whoever it was feels strongly that this should be stated, he or she should explain it better. DanielM 14:02, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My question

[edit]

I suppose that the stuffy mindset would be a dealbreaker. The part which puzzles me is that encyclopedic knowledge is noteworthy and has survived the test of time and will be read by many, while most journalism is on a trivial subject which will be forgotten by the end of the week. -Oreo Priest 15:32, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Vivacissamamente. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Vivacissamamente. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Sphere-surgery3.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]