Jump to content

Talk:1999 (Prince album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Um

[edit]

Aside from the fact that the term "white radio-friendly rock and roll" is a somewhat inaccurate description of "Little Red Corvette" (a pop song with mostly synthesizers and drum machines) it's also a fairly abrasive, explicitly racial statement, even if the song did break Prince to the wider (white) rock audience.

This being said, it's an awkward, potentially offenseive inclusion, since Prince is not white and therefore has never technically made "white" music and categorizing certain songs in his catalogue as "white" is a potentially ugly and controversial thing to do-- in addition, not all radio-friendly music is "white" and not all rock is "radio-friendly"; also, "white" music is a vague, POV term and problematic concept, especially with regards to Prince, whose music was championed as being able to appeal to both white and black audience. I'm gonna revise the sentence since it--didn't exactly offend me, but annoyed me and struck me as way too abrasive and POV for an encyclopedia article, even if I understand the idea behind the phrase. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.247.109.101 (talk) 21:00, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 22:58, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 22:58, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 22:58, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 22:58, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 22:58, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:1999 (Prince album)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

* Green tickY All the start class criteria
  • Green tickY A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
  • Green tickY At least one section of prose (excluding the lead section)
  • Green tickY A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
  • Red XN A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
Lacks technical personnel list.Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:44, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Substituted at 21:31, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 1999 (Prince album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:50, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicting claims

[edit]

A reader contacted Wikimedia to point out that there appear to be conflicting claims in two articles:

The reader is in Turkey and so cannot directly contribute to Wikipedia.

Can someone sort this out?--S Philbrick(Talk) 18:23, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]