Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heron programming language

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This discussion is now closed, and Heron programming language was kept, as no consensus was reached. In all, I count 15 delete votes and somewhere between 9 and 13 keep votes, depending on which votes are counted; in any event it's clear there was not consensus, neither in the first round of voting nor in the second round. -- Further edits to this page will probably be ignored. Wile E. Heresiarch 08:15, 24 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Re: Heron programming language

Pseudo-ToC (since headings & hence real ToC not premissible in material for transclusion)

  1. Pseudo-ToC
  2. Original Discussion and Voting
  3. Disputed Discussion and Voting, after Time Limit
  4. Isn't this Resumed Voting Illegitimate?
  5. Statement from User:Francs2000 [and responses]


Original Discussion and Voting

Vanity project, nonnotable programming language. Google search for Heron "programming language" yields 915 hits, most of which are for the project website [1] or directories or link lists, as well as many accidental hits (e.g., programs for Heron's formula or computers named "heron"). No evidence that Heron has any programmers other than its creator. Project web site doesn't claim anyone else is using Heron. Wile E. Heresiarch 01:58, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Re-listed on vfd due to a deadlocked discussion -- Graham ☺ | Talk 22:50, 17 Jul 2004 (UTC)

  • Delete. If Heron someday becomes widely-used, Mr. Diggins or another programmer is welcome to recreate the article. Until then, the language's lack of notability warrants deletion of this article. Spectatrix 02:46, 2004 Jul 11 (UTC)
  • NeutralDelete. Appears to be a real language, and I'm not sure that this language is any worse than many of the other dubious entries in the List of programming languages. Agreed however that it appears to be new and the author is possibly using Wikipedia for advertising. It's a toss-up for me, as it's hard to judge whether a programming language is encyclopedic using the same criteria that would be applied for other articles. Development technologies are just so fleeting. -- Stevietheman 03:42, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
    • The language is completely open source, and could easily be taken by anyone in the future and developed further if they care to. Open source software is in the public domain and can not be removed, thus negating the argument that Heron may be considered fleeting Christopher Diggins 21:26, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Neutral. Difficult to tell if it is more that original research. It would not bother me if we keep it, but I can also live without it. --Alexandre 08:53, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. It may be marginally notable at the moment but mentioning the author looks pretty pov. Cutler 21:26, Jul 11, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Vanity. He created his own personal page, too. Ambivalenthysteria 23:45, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
    • I support deletion of the Christopher Diggins page, I created it because I could. Christopher Diggins 21:26, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Changing vote to keep, with pov-cleanup. Still support deletion of Christopher Diggins until such a time as Heron gains notability. Spectatrix 23:56, 2004 Jul 11 (UTC)
  • Keep. Borderline, the fact that it seems to be a good article sways me. Andrewa 02:59, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
    • It doesn't bother you that the author is the sole programmer of this language? Sorry, I have to ask. Wile E. Heresiarch 03:41, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
      • Definitely not. A language can have one primary author and become ubiquitous and used by millions. So can an operating system kernel like a silly penguin-picture vanity project called Linux. Jamesday 04:44, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
        • You seem to have missed the point. Diggins is the only author of this language -- no problem. He is also, apparently, the only person who ever wrote a program in this language. Until, of course, he gets his pals Skrud and Kriggs to write "Hello, world". Wile E. Heresiarch 11:53, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
          • You don't know that. Heck I don't even know that. I know there has been 10,000 visitors to http://www.heron-language.com so I think a few people may have written Heron programs by now. My response was not dignified and regrettable Christopher Diggins 21:26, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Programming languages tend not to be ephemeral, and sometime in the distant future someone could run across some Heron code and wonder about the language. The article does need to be expanded, however. Withdrawn. I vote to delete. Jeeves 03:57, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Rebuttal, from originator (who is thus ineligible to vote). I am, of course, using Wikipedia for self serving purposes, as are many other contributors. That should not change the outcome of these proceedings. The votes expressed up to this point have not indicated any special consideration of programming language design, theory or history, nor has any one seem to have done any particular background research on Heron itself. Voting upon a programming language entry in this manner is a joke, and I refuse to participate further. In protest of people forcing their behaviour models on me I also continue to refuse to create an account. Christopher Diggins 66.130.152.126 04:24, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC) I have decided to participate properly by creating a user account and behaving myself Christopher Diggins 21:26, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
    • [Moved (along w/ following note), annotated, vote struck thru by Jerzy(t) 05:58, 2004 Jul 12 (UTC)]
    • Christopher, if you have evidence of encyclopedic relevance to present to us, please do. I am a seasoned programmer, and I had never heard of Heron until this delete debate. We want to be open-minded here. Further, refusing to open an account as a "protest" smacks as an ego issue in here; that is, that declaration only hurts your cause. Also, don't waste our time with sock puppets--we know who new users are. -- Stevietheman 13:59, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
      • I did not create sock puppets as Wile has demonstrated. I resent the implication. I suggested to my friends to join and express an opinion. The votes should be based on the value of the entry rather than my personal actions or my disagreeable character, or my large ego. - Christopher Diggins 66.130.167.160 00:26, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
        • OK, I will assume no sock puppets. However, like it or not, ego is seen as an indicator in these proceedings--it often makes it clear the intentions of the article author. But that all said, I'd be happy to entertain any information you can provide that supports the encyclopedic revelance of the article above what's already been said by others. I'd be happy to change my vote from 'neutral' to 'keep' if it becomes warranted. -- Stevietheman 15:16, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
          • The case for the entry: Heron is more deserving of an entry as a programming language than some of the fake and joke languages listed on the esoteric programming language page. The entry is less self-serving than an entry in list of software companies, as well as the various commercial products references that are scattered throughout the programming language section pages. There have been many discussions of Heron on usenet [2]. There is mention of Heron in Dr. Dobbs Journal [3]. Heron has been discussed on several mailing lists, and I have given two seminars on it so far, with another one scheduled in October. I think the strongest argument for keeping Heron would be that it is open source, and contains some novel approaches to programming language design which could be useful to programmers and researchers looking for information on programming languages. The Heron documentation [4] is a useful reference for people doing comparative studies of programming languages, and interested in alternative approaches to various programming paradigms such as AOP, OOP, DbC etc. Christopher Diggins 22:33, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
            • Christopher, let me try to clarify what kind of evidence (speaking for myself here) could make Heron notable. Has Heron been adopted for a commercial project? Has some professor made his/her students do their classwork in Heron? Did someone write their dissertation about implementing some feature in Heron? That kind of active interest would boost the notability -- how far, well, depends. In closing, let me note that I have my own vanity project which I think is wonderful, and, yes, I've given seminars and written papers; it will get a WP article only when it gets enough attention from others (at present, not anywhere close, sadly). Fwiw, Wile E. Heresiarch 03:41, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)
              • This set of rules along, would invalidate a large number of existing programming languages listed on Wikipedia. Should we delete those as well? Christopher Diggins 01:59, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
            • Christopher, nothing you presented is convincing. The only two ideas in your presentation worth looking at were the first two footnote links. The first link to a Google newsgroup search shows the top 9 articles coming from you, then the second link points to an article by you. I agree with Wile that while the work you're doing is possibly very valuable, it doesn't hold encyclopedic relevance at this time. Like Wile, I'm also pursuing what I think are great ideas and have a website to promote them; however, we realize our ideas aren't ready for inclusion in an encyclopedia. Further, the first argument you made about other articles less deserving is like the universally unsound argument "others are breaking the rules, so why can't I?". At any rate, I'm still looking forward to seeing some evidence of encyclopedic relevance. I've decided. -- Stevietheman 15:47, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)
              • The so-called unsound argument I use about "breaking the rules", was brought up because precedent establishes new rules. If Heron is no less appropriate than many other listed programming languages, then should I start voting for their deletion? This would in my opinion be doing a disservice to the users of wikipedia. Christopher Diggins 01:59, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • No vote, as I know nothing and care little about programming languages (provided they continue to function properly). Moved this from below the footer section. Rhymeless 04:52, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. I'm a programmer, I'd previously heard of it, it's been presented at at least one symposium [5] in the field and it's unsurprising that those who don't follow programming language developments don't know what this or something like C# are and why they are of interest. It might fall into insignificance five years from now, in which case it'll be deletable then. Jamesday 04:44, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
    • I'm changing my vote from Neutral to Delete based on this argument. Do a poll of programmers and I guarantee you nobody will have heard of Heron, while a vast majority will have heard of C#. One symposium does not make an idea significant enough for inclusion here. -- Stevietheman 16:16, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep, on advice of several specialists abv: the language deserves it, even though the contributor deserves to be spanked & sent home: "Don't. Pro. Test. At. Wiki. Pedia." --Jerzy(t) 05:58, 2004 Jul 12 (UTC)
    • I apologize, I accept that the VfD pages are not the correct forum for this kind of debate or protest. Christopher Diggins 21:26, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Perhaps a premature addition to Wikipedia, but I've seen the language and presentations on it, and it's existance is more warranted than it's removal. Kriggs 07:15, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
    • First edit by User:66.131.119.242. Presumably the same Kriggs who wrote [6], As a favour to my friend Christopher Diggins, please do me this favour in checking out Heron, a programming language from which I expect great things in the future. This is his main venture at the moment, and he is in need of more exposure. What are friends for, anyway? Wile E. Heresiarch 11:53, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
      • I don't know if that necessarily disqualifies me, but if so, fine. But if I am his friend in the first place, it is because I found out about him through his language at a presentation he gave at Concordia university. And whether I am eligible to vote or not, my statement is, as far as I am allowed to claim, honest. Kriggs 20:00, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Heron has some interesting features despite the fact that it is still in development, and deserves a closer look. DrSkrud 07:48, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
    • First edit by User:DrSkrud. Presumably this is whoever hosts a blog which advertises Heron [7]. Wile E. Heresiarch 11:53, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
      • Naturally, because I'm interested in the language. You'll notice my blog also has various links to Wikipedia. DrSkrud 14:20, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Albeit minority language, beginning to come across the odd reference to it in various places. Sjc 08:01, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: The aggressive spamming of the VfD page, the stated goal of the article being "get some exposure," the fact that it's original research, all tell me that this is an attempt to turn Wikipedia into a platform for exposure. This is an ethical violation, IMO, and not much different from someone who repeatedly put up entry after entry for Coke C2 or something: delete this article and start afresh when the language establishes itself and no longer "needs some exposure." Geogre 18:38, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
    • I did not spam the VfD pages. I encouraged my friends to vote , see democracy -- Christopher Diggins 66.130.167.160 00:26, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Wikipedia is not a place to place ads for your programming language. You'll know your work is encyclopedic when somebody besides you feels the need to write about your accomplishments. Until then, you're as unencyclopedic as the rest of us shmucks. :) --Fastfission 00:55, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
    • I agree that I am unencyclopedic, and I support deletion of my personal page. I feel as the authour and leading authourity on Heron though I am the most qualified individual to write an entry on Heron. Christopher Diggins 21:26, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
      • Unfortunately, I think this would go against Wikipedia's policy of rejecting original research. We are only concerned with collecting consensus knowledge in an objective manner. While you may be the "most qualified" person to write about your language, that's what your web site is for. When the language you have created becomes significant in the computer programming world, an article will be written about it. We've thrown out many other articles about the projects of individuals which haven't yet become high-profile enough to warrant inclusion. I agree with Geogre's sentiments above. Jeeves 09:10, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. The language serves as a useful implementation for Object_oriented_programming, Generic_programming, Meta_programming, Aspect_oriented_programming and Design_by_contract. These are all topics that are covered by the Wikipedia for which reference implementations can be difficult to come by. With regards to spamming the VfD page, if a post on the language weblog can generate enough response to constitute the description 'spam,' doesn't this contradict the idea that there is not enough interest in the language? Disclaimer: I am not a 'friend' of Christopher_Diggins and I do not know him in any other capacity other than as the creator of Heron. Ged Byrne
    • Sole contribution by Ged Byrne. As with Kriggs and DrSkrud, this vote shows an interest in Heron but not in Wikipedia. Lest you think I'm picking on you, single-issue voters get this treatment on a regular basis. Fwiw, Wile E. Heresiarch 03:19, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)
    • It is worth noting that the vote above (signed, not forged, by Ged) was not struck thru by Wile, but by the same IP who a few minutes later, made a(forged) sig (just below this entry) as Ged. I.e., the IP (whom i assume to be Ged being careless about signing on, and later forging his own sig to compensate, rather than Chris impersonating or inventing Ged) was responsive to the thrust of Wile's "sole contribution" complaint. I earlier read him as saying "so what?" to Wile's complaint; i think that i and probably others misjudged him to that extent. --Jerzy(t) 14:48, 2004 Jul 21 (UTC)
      • No problems, everybody was a sole contributor once. I am, however, interested in Wikipedia and have made minor anonymous edits from time to time. True, these have all been in support of languages that interest me, such as adding Eiffel to the list of OO languages, but surely the whole idea of Wiki is that people can contribute to issues they are interested in. Isn't it this democratic process that separates Wikipedia from the traditional encyclopedias? Ged ByrneUser:193.129.160.2
        • I have struck thru and replaced the preceding signature, per the history diffs output, which indicates that formally it amounts to a signature forged by an IP. While i see no reason to infer effort to deceive, i think ignoring it would undercut the integrity of our records. --Jerzy(t) 08:15, 2004 Jul 21 (UTC)
  • Delete. Non-notable. There are countless programming languages with only one author, so far I have not seen any indication that this deserves mention above the hundreds of others. --Starx 19:35, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Disputed Discussion and Voting after Time Limit

Current tally (at time of re-listing) 5 keep (excluding suspected sockpuppets), 7 delete. -- Graham ☺ | Talk 22:51, 17 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Comment: I dispute Graham's count of the number of deletes and keeps. I didn't count the first time contributors. I still strongly dispute the characterization of these people as sock puppets. It is rude and incorrect.

  • delete -> WileE
  • delete -> StevieTheMan
  • keep -> Cutler
  • delete -> Ambibalynsteria
  • keep -> Spectatrix
  • keep -> AndrewA
  • delete -> Jeeves
  • keep -> Jamesday
  • keep -> Jerzy
  • keep -> sjc
  • delete -> Geogre
  • delete -> Fastfission
  • delete -> Starx

This adds up to 7 deletes and 6 keeps as of July 17, is there contention here? Christopher Diggins 01:32, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)

  • Ok I missed one, 6 keep it is. Hardly surprising one was missed considering the mish mash of discussion above; besides I would encourage any sysop going to decide consensus next time to recount all of the votes anyway and decide for themselves whether the three in question are sockpuppets or not. Incidentally the reason why these are suspected sockpuppets is because new users don't generally make a vote on this page their first edit here. It's a possibility, which is why they're suspected sockpuppets. -- Graham ☺ | Talk 17:52, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
    • Did Wile E not already make the point that Skrud and Kriggs were clearly not sock puppets? As he pointed out they are people who link to Heron from their personal web pages [[8]] and [[9]]. They learned about Heron at a seminar at Concordia and started discussing Heron at Skrud's forum where I found them and started a new discussion group [[10]], GedB is also a regular at Joel on Software forum who got interested in Heron as a result of a discussion at [[11]]. Nonetheless this is all moot because isn't the policy to not count first time contributors? The reason they came here was because of the following posts I made at [[12]] Christopher Diggins 22:06, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
      • Hmm? Skrud and I are long time fans of wikipedia, and I for one have made contributions to wikipedia. The only way I could be called into question is if you linking me here gives an unfair leverage for the "Keep" side. Kriggs 05:29, 24 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep, I don't think it is particularly notable but there are a lot of programming languages of similarly low notability with articles, I don't want to delete them all and I don't want to vote for a precedent that would justify deleting them all. —Stormie 02:09, Jul 18, 2004 (UTC)
    • Stormie brings up a good point. I would be completely justified and supported with historical precedent if I took follow-up actions upon a delete vote to challenge the rather large number of languages using the same arguments presented here. The debates surrounding Heron arose for several reasons: I mistakenly created a false user page, I ignorantly created a so-called vanity page, I expressed criticism of wikipedia, I was argumentative and protestive. My point in protesting, and being uncooperative was that an encyclopedia should be built upon a fair and consistent application of rules towards each entry, rather than an emotional reaction.Christopher Diggins 01:32, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. I feel that a programming language needs a history and impact in the field in some way. Heron has neither. -- Solitude 02:26, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Christopher, Kriggs, Ged Byrne, and DrSkrud: if the Heron programming language is significant, others will come later and add it to the Wikipedia. But this is not the right place to advertise your project. It's not aggressive self-promotion that makes a language popular, but utility. If your language has it, then it'll get an article here one day, written by some engineer who used your language to implement some mission-critical functionality and would be glad to tell the world why Heron was so cool. Please stop doing this. --Ardonik 04:00, Jul 18, 2004 (UTC)
    • Please stop doing what? I am contributing to a conversation. I made an entry, and I am allowed to dispute the arguments put forth towards its deletion. The mission-critical argument would invalidate the large majority of current entries in the list of programming languages. Christopher Diggins 01:59, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
      • Stop doing what? Obviously, I'm asking you to stop the agressive self-promotion and Wikipedia-equivalent of carpetbagging that you've done here on the VfD, discussed extensively above. My advice is to let this whole thing go; Heron will survive without a Wikipedia article. --Ardonik 03:42, Jul 19, 2004 (UTC)
        • It is unfair to characterize me as a spammer and being "aggressively self-promotional". Contributing to this discussion does little to promote Heron. Christopher Diggins 18:16, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. It doesn't seem unlikely that someone would hear about Heron in the "real world". Several sources referring to it have been noted. It is also reasonable to think that someone hearing about the language would come to Wikipedia to learn more about it, owing to our good coverage of programming languages (and tech topics in general). The article needs more editors apart from the creator, but that is true for many articles and does not warrant deletion. David Remahl 08:14, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)
    • Delete. After a second review, I agree that the language is neither mature nor notable enough to warrant an article. David Remahl 12:07, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. As of now the language is not established. When the language has been used for production, teaching, or research then somebody other than the author should and will probably make an entry. Thue | talk 14:07, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)
    • production, teaching, research as requirements would invalidate a large number of previous articles. Christopher Diggins 01:59, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep - Wikipedia is not that selective, and has plenty of room. --Ezra Wax 04:02, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete - clicking through various links, the blogs mentioned above, etc etc, I must commend the author of the language for writing it, and continuing to work on it. On the other hand, I don't see it as noteable (YET), and thereby I do not see it as deserving an article. And just to counter the already breathed arguement "but lots of non-noteable languages have articles". Bring them on. I'll vote to delete. Lyellin 10:20, Jul 19, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep Frankly there is a lot more stuff worthy of deletion than this, over and above minority programming languages. I think we could probably, for example, remove any number of articles about Middle Earth and its confabulated ancillary bs as being less worthy of note than what looks to be an honest and serious endeavour to create a new programming language and to bring it to public attention. If, however, over time, the Heron programming language dead ends, then it will no longer require an article, and it will die a quiet death in any case. As a subject this probably isn't worth the amount of time and attention that is being paid to it. Live with the article in my view, and move on, maybe revisit the situation in a few months. Sjc 10:32, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
    • Sjc has already voted. Christopher Diggins 18:16, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
      • Lol, so I have; that would be my wife (who is my reverse sock puppet, i.e. we frequently share my account). Mea culpa Sjc 04:07, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
        • Reverse sock puppets are IMO a bad idea even for editing, and too confusing to consider in the case of voting. She should get her own acct, or vote anon. --Jerzy(t) 23:58, 2004 Jul 20 (UTC)
  • Comment: The following are some programming language listings that are also deserving of being included in the VfD according to the arguments presented here, which should in all fairness be put under the same scrutiny as Heron: A plus plus, BuildProfessional, ChucK, Escapade, Frink, F Sharp programming language, Godiva programming language, Groovy programming language, ICI Programming Language, Io programming language, Joy programming language, Joule programming language, Kogut programming language, Kvikkalkul programming language, LYaPAS programming language, Malbolge programming language, Mercury programming language, MOO programming language, Nice programming language, Nosica programming language, Nial programming language, Nemerle, Pike programming language, Pizza programming language, [[Processing (programming language)], Q programming language, Revolution programming language, Scala, SuperCollider programming language, Unlambda, Var'aq, Whitespace (programming language), XOTcl, Z programming language, ZZT-oop Christopher Diggins 18:16, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Just FYI, several of these languages you mention are good examples of why yours shouldn't be included yet. ZZT was widely-known and distributed in its day, and its OO language was very interesting at the time. Pike has been used in a number of projects, including DreamSNES, the SNES emulator for the Sega Dreamcast. Thousands of people have seen the Pike logo from that project alone. MOO code has been around since 1990 and has had various successes and failures; LambdaMOO remains the major testament to its power. I have heard of Godiva in the context of Icon as well. Those are just off the top of my head. I haven't actually looked at any of those links. Jeeves 22:27, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. See Wikipedia:No original research. You can nominate the other languages for deletion as well, if you like. - DropDeadGorgias (talk) 20:17, Jul 19, 2004 (UTC)
    • Is it original research, though? The information in the article is available in the official language documentation. David Remahl 21:11, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. --Gary D 23:01, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete, promotional, vanity. Unless much better evidence is provided that the language is of encyclopedic importance--e.g. that the language is in actual use for significant non-experimental projects, or is currently being taught in academic courses, or has been the subject of papers in recognized journals. I've just been Googling and looking for hits that did not obviously refer back to the http://www.heron-language.com/ site. I finally thought I had hit paydirt with polymorphism without class inheritance beginning "I am presenting a talk at Concordia University in Montreal next week, on how the Heron programming language provides object polymorphism without class inheritance through the use of interfaces..." It turned out to be a talk by Christopher Diggins. The argument that we have other articles that may merit deletion does not seem to me to be a weighty reason for keeping this one. Wikipedia has no interest in being the first to publish something or in "scooping" other sources. When and if Heron catches on the article can always be resubmitted. Has Heron ever been discussed in Slashdot? (Click, click) Apparently not. If the author were to submit an article on Heron to Slashdot and it were to be published, I'd change my vote to "keep." Dpbsmith 23:10, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Isn't this Resumed Voting Illegitimate?

This and the next pseudo-section have been moved to become the start of Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy#Specifics Moved from VfD Discussion of Heron programming language, a page dedicated to policy issues like those that have been raised here. --Jerzy(t) 07:35, 2004 Jul 21 (UTC)

Statement from User:Francs2000 [and responses]

This and the preceding pseudo-section have been moved to become the start of Wikipedia talk:Deletion policy#Specifics Moved from VfD Discussion of Heron programming language, a page dedicated to policy issues like those that have been raised here. --Jerzy(t) 07:35, 2004 Jul 21 (UTC)

The force of further discussion of this page's topic, possible deletion of Heron programming language, is in some doubt.

Expressions of concern about such doubt are more appropriate withinWikipedia talk:Deletion policy#Proposed/Evolving Policy for Exceeding 5 Days on VfD than here.

Notice should appear here once any doubt ends.
--Jerzy(t) 07:35, 2004 Jul 21 (UTC)

  • Please keep. It is nice to have comprehensive information on programming languages in Wikipedia. But for the god' sake, do not delete articles on historical programming languages mentioned in the discussion. For example JOSS article was very usefull to me and I was very happy when i found it in Wikipedia (by mere chance, if i had remembered the name, i could google for it)--Kyknos 23:27, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Heron_programming_language&oldid=357524710"