User talk:X-Bahamut

Heh. Davion or Clan Wolf are more my style. :D X-Bahamut

Links work best when they are, or are very close to, the word being linked within an article. So dont do Battletech: Battlespace: Jumpship: rather just create Jumpship. When a disamabiguation is needed, one should use: [[aerospace fighter (Battletech)|aerospace fighter]] Lirath Q. Pynnor

Mrm. 'k. Seems I misunderstood the disambiguation bits in some of the various help wikis here. Oh well, staying up all night and finding something neato and new(To me.) will do that to a person. I'll keep it in mind, thanks. X-Bahamut 19:52, 19 Nov 2003 (UTC)

I doubt you misunderstood anything, there are lots of outofdate "rules" floating around -- we haven't been using that archiac subcategory method for over a year. Youll see why if you persist in using it, its a pain to link stuff and eventually you'll find some article that doesn't neatly fit into one single category. Lirath Q. Pynnor

And also, since you are new, be forewarned that inevitably somebody is going to remove, revert, or do something to an article which you don't like. The calmer you stay, they easier it is to deal with such issues. Lirath Q. Pynnor

Heh, yeah, I realize that. Can't see it bothering me unless it's done maliciously. In which case, I've read that's dealt with quickly enough anyhow. Thanks for the heads up, in any case. X-Bahamut 20:07, 19 Nov 2003 (UTC)

In my FASA books, they spell it BattleTech. Lirath Q. Pynnor

Far as I've been aware, I've been following the convention. Feel free to correct any accidentally unshifted Ts you find. X-Bahamut 04:27, 20 Nov 2003 (UTC)

K, Just re-checked it, the registered copyright definitely has a capital T. Lirath Q. Pynnor

I just don't understand: Capital world, [[BattleTech:Inner Sphere#Atreus|Atreus]] -- Why don't you want to just create a link to Atreus or Atreus (Battletech)? Lirath Q. Pynnor

Just plain didn't occur to me. Heh. I'll get on it... X-Bahamut

AfD nomination of Successor States

Successor States, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Successor States satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Successor States and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Successor States during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 23:43, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tharkad (BattleTech)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tharkad (BattleTech), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Tharkad (BattleTech). Judgesurreal777 (talk) 06:34, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Avalon (BattleTech)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article New Avalon (BattleTech), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of New Avalon (BattleTech). Judgesurreal777 (talk) 06:37, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of BattleTech technology

I have nominated BattleTech technology, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BattleTech technology. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Marasmusine (talk) 13:29, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Successor States

The article Successor States has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No notability asserted through reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 04:46, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Successor States for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Successor States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Successor States (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 04:49, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Clans (BattleTech) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clans (BattleTech) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clans (BattleTech) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:20, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of BattleTech characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of BattleTech characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of BattleTech characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:55, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]