Talk:Knowledge Aided Retrieval in Activity Context
This article was nominated for deletion on 11 August 2024. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Untitled
[edit]..., however recent events have indicated the need for a proactive mechanism for anticipating terrorist atrocities.
This is not a quite a neutral point of view and will also "date quickly". --- Jagged
I don't think this contravenes NPOV; I am not American and I can see why you probably need such a system. The dates quickly is not a big deal either in Wikipedia where the information can be modified as events unfold but I'll fix it in a temporal context relative to recent events. I am going to reinstate it since it qualifies the marker about civil liberties. sjc
Yes, that seems flow better and gives more facts behind the statement rather than having it just read like an opinion.
Not only does the references look better than the word recent, but in my opinion we should not be relying on being able to edit the entries in the future. What would happen if someone were to take a snapshot of Wikipedia and archive it for future use? Someone reading the first revision of this entry in 50 years time would be confused by that last sentance, however the current revision would give them the reference they would need to understand this entry. --- Jagged
This kind of goes with the territory, I'm afraid. My parents have an old encyclopaedia in which aluminium is described as a metal of the future.... sjc
A different question: Who is developing the system? CIA, FBI, ... ? --css
It is being developed by an independant company (Applied Systems Intelligence). Originally, the idea came out of some work being done by the US Air Force on global information exchange. The work is being done nominally for the Air Force, although it has far wider applications. sjc
- Stub-Class Crime-related articles
- Low-importance Crime-related articles
- Stub-Class Terrorism articles
- Low-importance Terrorism articles
- Terrorism task force articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- Stub-Class Law enforcement articles
- Low-importance Law enforcement articles
- WikiProject Law Enforcement articles
- Stub-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Stub-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles