User talk:Ttwaring

Welcome!

Hello, Ttwaring, Welcome to Wikipedia!

I hope you like working here and want to continue. If you need help on how to name new articles, look at the Guide to layout, and for help on formatting the pages visit the Manual of Style. If you need general help, look at Help and the FAQ, and if you can't find your answer there, check the Village pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions). There's still more help at the Tutorial and the Policy Library. Also, don't forget to visit the Community Portal — and if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my New-Users' Talk Page.

Additional tips:

Here are some extra tips to help you get around Wikipedia:

If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, try the Sandbox.
Click on the Edit button on a page, and look at how other editors did what they did.
You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Always sign comments on Talk pages, never sign Articles.
You might want to add yourself to the New User Log
If your first language isn't English, try Wikipedia:Contributing to articles outside your native language
Full details on Wikipedia style can be found in the Manual of Style.

Happy editing!

Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 21:20, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Renamed London Underground stations

Thanks for spotting the grammatical mistakes, all 8 of them. I would have checked through the article properly once completed and would have spotted those mistakes anyway. Thanks for your help though. It saved me some time. Are you fairly new to Wikipedia? Please reply on my talk page. Greaterlondoner

typos are typos

re your recent edits at Che Guevara: the edit summary stated "fixed typos". a typo is a minor slip of the finger or brain, and few of those were fixed in your sweep. many small changes (not necessarily corrections) were made, some of which were opinionated calls that, according to wikipedia guidelines, should have been left in the style of the original contributors (e.g., spaces around emdashes). such changes can provoke conflict unnecessarily, simply over matters of taste; in effect, you're trying to enforce a style you're comfortable with, but you do so by removing something somebody else was equally comfortable with, with no clear winner. and the first emdash removal was questionable, in my opinion. in any case, i encourage you to leave accurate edit summaries, whatever you decide to change. SaltyPig 00:27, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Point taken. I will avoid changing that kind of thing in the future. I counted four style changes, four typos fixed (one of which fixed a link) and one other fixed link.Ttwaring 12:30, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi there! I'd like to express my thanks for reverting vandalism to my user page yesterday, so thanks! ;-) Happy editing. SoLando (Talk) 09:20, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Suffragan Bishops Act 1534

Hi. I left it as bare Perth because I'm not at all sure that Perth, Scotland is what's meant: why would the C of E have a bishop in Scotland? And why would it be the only town in Scotland listed? I looked around for other copies of the list (there's one in Tracts for the Times) and either this entry was emended to Penrith, which is a reasonable guess except that Penrith already appears in the list, or Pereth, which doesn't seem to be the name of anything anywhere. Very mysterious. The Wednesday Island 01:33, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eden Montana hoaxes

Thanks! All the sock accounts are now blocked and the anon IP has a final warning. NawlinWiki 15:34, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Got this last batch too, and protected Eden Montana-Caceda. Thanks, NawlinWiki 14:14, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- And the latest ones. Blocked the new username and the anon IP User:121.209.209.244. Thanks again, NawlinWiki (talk) 21:28, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

EmmaButton

I'm not exactly sure what it is you are asking me to do. seresin | wasn't he just...? 00:34, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, okay. WP:SSP would be the place to go, methinks. I'm completely clueless when it comes to sockhunting, so that's pretty much all the direction I can give you. Sorry. seresin | wasn't he just...? 00:41, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What words mean in Spanish

I really don't give a **** what it means because I like your translations of Spanish language or any other language stuff, anyhow, right? Ericthebrainiac (talk) 19:21, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Brother

Thanks, bro. Ericthebrainiac (talk) 17:42, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Islas Canarias = Canary Islands

The link from the Spanish article that links to the English articles regards the denomination of the place from different (language-related) perspectives. However, the name in Spanish makes mention of neither posession or of islands. If the telescope was named Gran Telescopio de las Islas Canarias, then the correct translation would be "Great Telescope of the Canary Islands." However, such is not the case. The term "Canarias" in Spanish is directly translated as "Canaries" in English. If you can find an English source (Newspaper would probably be easiest and most reliable) that supports a specific terminology in English, feel free to edit the article and reference your changes. However, if you cannot find such source, a direct-to-English translation remains the best option rather than attempting to distort the Spanish meaning in order to make it "sound good" in English.--$%MarshalN20%$ (talk) 00:14, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:29, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

glassdoor.com

I'm not sure what you're getting at. There may be many reasons why a site would no longer display content--fear of litigation, for instance. HuffPo and Reuters are reliable sources, so a lack of continued display by primary source seems no issue. Fleetham (talk) 19:21, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request for help

Hi, I don't know if you're someone I should be appealing to, but I have a problem with the Lanix page. User:Foxxygrandpa added a section on 3d TVs that is not supported by the citations provided. All of the cites are in Spanish and if you look at a translated example here, which purports to support the claim that Lanix is working in cooperation with the National Autonomous University of Mexico, you'll see it makes no mention of Lanix. None of the citations do. I've tried to talk to Foxxygrandpa on his user page but he just ignores me. I tried to delete his edits, but he just reverts them. Please help Fleetham (talk) 17:15, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry!

Thanks for catching my mistake. And I've kept the Canada bit in but added some explanation. I will provide better edit summaries and actually check sources before reverting in the future. Fleetham (talk) 22:44, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Plumpy'nut

I was really more concerned with the edit's mention that you could eat "a packet" at home. I think it's something like a 2 month regimen to cure malnutrition. Someone has edited for POV since my last edit and removed the word "tasty" from the lead. Do you think the page continues to be ad-like or can we now take down that top tag? Fleetham (talk) 20:09, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

lvl 3

In regards to your recent revert: while I don't disagree that the issue has been discussed at length, I believe the outcome of that discussion was my well couched assertion that the material did not contravene Wikipedia policy to which you did not reply. No consensus has been reached on keeping the material off the page, and I encourage you to go back and review my arguments. Fleetham (talk) 18:47, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

for reminding me to clean up ;) , my apologies for the trouble and regards Ðℬig XЯaɣ 12:50, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I was actually drinking a cup of tea when I opened this page :-) - Ttwaring (talk) 21:36, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

well that was from me , you know

-- Ðℬig XЯaɣ 01:40, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Warning IP vandal

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Silvrous ^Talk 15:20, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Improving TV pages

Thank you for your recent comments, I understand you points about the quotations being accurate, ( trying to type and keep track of what is being written is sometime a bit of a mishmash) I will be double checking over this coming week any new quotations I have added to this and few other pages.--Crazyseiko (talk) 13:29, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! - Ttwaring (talk) 16:54, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry~

Hi, thank you for pointing out my mistake in editting level 3 communications. I am not a robot, so I wasn't mechanically putting in stuff without reading it, and I can make mistake, too. Generally speaking, I would read the sentence I put in, but I'm sorry that yesterday I was accidently doing something else while adding the sentence, maybe that's why I neglected where it conflicts. I would treat it more seriously in the future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lvzhpchristina (talk • contribs) 00:13, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tynemouth

Hello, I'm Ajguy94. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!

Not constructive?! You had just a link to a page and I gave you a better link, and some text around it. I also gave you some editing advice on producing links on your talk page! By the way, remember to sign your contributions to talk pages. Ttwaring (talk) 04:13, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

the world is small

Hi Twaring, first, you've edited alongside Fleetham, and then Santillana del Mar...which I know (some). I am curious: what is it about, that it's on your user page? You don't have to answer, of course. Happy Holidays anyway.--Wuerzele (talk) 02:39, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's just somewhere I've been, while learning Spanish, and I remembered the story about being the "villa de las tres mentiras, puesto que ni es santa, ni llana, ni tiene mar". I'm not sure I've ever edited the Wikipedia page, though. I have edited Adamari López, the other link on the page. Watching her act in telenovelas has also improved my Spanish. Ttwaring (talk) 15:51, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there.

sorry about that edit error I made, have reverted that contribution I made, and fixed up bad sentence. thanks for letting me know. Best Regards. Hot Pork Pie (talk) 22:43, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I need help

I wanna update Chris benoit and Nancy Benoit page but it keeps deleting how do I add citations and evidence thank u ThePegusasKid1 (talk) 01:57, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CopyRight

This is false information plus it was taken away from me so that's copyright. I'm the owner of all these sayings. So yes I can remove it. JohnnyDab31353 (talk) 02:20, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

I'm am sorry for my disruptive editing, I will reframe from my immature actions. Thank you for confronting me on this allagation. Mikey bear (talk) 02:22, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ttwaring. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I'm am responding to your post

Hi how are you. I am responding to your post about "black triangle UFO". Yes I did post it and it's not an error. I'm sorry that I didn't provide reasonable explanation. I did post it. So if you want you can revert it. Thank you and have a great day. Chinathedog (talk) 00:13, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment moved

Thanks for that - Ttwaring - please take a look at my Instagram - cross_your_fingers - and let me know - if your going to unremove it. Many Thanks. Kimi. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cross your fngers (talk • contribs) 17:52, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ttwaring. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians who like NationStates

Hey! Based on your edits to NationStates, I thought maybe you would be interested that I started a series of userboxes for the game. Feel free to add any or add your own!-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 06:35, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TT=Turing Test?

Does TT mean Turing Test?PhDMarkWilliamSchae1960 (talk) 19:36, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What's Become of Waring - Ttwaring (talk) 19:44, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ttwaring. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		thanks for keeping wiki factual and vandal-free! Alibino (talk) 14:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

G.S episodes

What? Those are how the episodes go, someone has to write down which episode is which so everyone knows plus they weren't copied I did type my own words in them. --174.44.116.157 (talk) 09:37, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you search for "Junior becomes jealous of George's friendship with a mouse and runs away from home" which appears in your edit then it appears as copyright material. Ttwaring (talk) 13:09, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. --174.44.116.157 (talk) 20:16, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all you do

Your splendid work reinforces the massive grip of tyranny, cruelty, malignantly obvious chaotic evil and the iron will required to rule, administrate and bodyguard this Wikipedia and perhaps Palestine afterwards

Never in all of my life has my purpose been so clearly defined:

"Reason for change unclear."

The omission of a magic word of finality only highlights the pithy complaints parroted by all fanclubs 100.12.241.197 (talk) 16:24, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Does Verizon have some kind of "Incoherent Friends and Family" plan? Ttwaring (talk) 17:30, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm flattered by this perhaps general purpose flattery

But it still lands

Whatever Verizon didn't have before for all customers and clients, it will now

8D 100.12.241.197 (talk) 19:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Who are you and why you touch my edits ?

Who are you and why you touch my edits ? don't you know fun ? 2601:18C:8283:4B40:1968:9D37:E6A2:9DDF (talk) 20:55, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Forbes list of the most valuable football clubs

for the football club teams value page and i found the source to inter miami's true value so here it is https://www.forbes.com/sites/justinbirnbaum/2024/02/02/major-league-soccers-most-valuable-teams-2024/?sh=3b72b0363347 2601:589:4984:3C00:29B1:2545:ABCD:A63D (talk) 21:12, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking. The problem is that the section you updated is a worldwide top 20, as of 2023. Just knowing the value of MLS clubs in 2024 doesn't help you update the table. We would need a new 2024 article from Forbes with the worldwide top 20. Ttwaring (talk) 21:20, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]