Talk:New Miserable Experience

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Alternative music

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Original Release

It's stated that the 1992 release differed from the 1993 release, wouldn't it be worthwhile to note these differences? Or is it just different artwork? Johnsorc 15:46, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, it's only different artwork. I have the superduper expanded edition and it doesn't appear to mention a different listing or anything. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 17:34, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanks! Is the extra content on the expanded edition worth buying? I haven't gotten it yet, but I've thought about it. Johnsorc 21:52, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It has a lot of hard-to-find early EP stuff, and some good live tracks. Great if you're a big fan like me. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEME?) 04:05, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, the difference is only in the artwork. For example, the layout on the original is much simpler - the insert is only a four-panel fold-out with pictures of the band taken during the recording sessions, and lacks lyrics. (The original just looks lower budget, honestly. Though, admittedly, I'm fond of it because of how much I listened to it in early '93 - it's the version I think of when I hear the songs now.) -- ChrisB 06:01, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Officially, it is only artwork. I own both and, being a sound engineer, I suspect mastering changes. No proof though. Joshuah Hounshell (talk) 23:28, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:GinBlossomsNewMiserableExperienceOriginal.jpg

Image:GinBlossomsNewMiserableExperienceOriginal.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:50, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Infobox

To reflect Shut Up And Smoke (EP) in the band's discography since I edited the page. Joshuah Hounshell (talk) 23:26, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"The background behind which the band began"?

They were behind the background? Were they hiding or something? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.5.46.84 (talk) 14:43, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Post Grunge

How can an album be "Post Grunge" in the middle of Grunge's popularity? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.134.68.102 (talk) 03:09, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New Miserable Experience. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160517115454/http://www.guitarworld.com/features-news-interviews/interview-gin-blossoms%E2%80%99-jesse-valenzuela-discusses-band%E2%80%99s-plans-2013/%0917607 to http://www.guitarworld.com/features-news-interviews/interview-gin-blossoms%E2%80%99-jesse-valenzuela-discusses-band%E2%80%99s-plans-2013/%0917607

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:21, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]