Talk:Greifswald

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hanseatic League, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Hanseatic LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject Hanseatic LeagueTemplate:WikiProject Hanseatic LeagueHanseatic League articles

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Nationalist bias?

I can't quite get behind the concept of adding the Polish word for Greifswald. Why not add French, Italian, Russian, Estonian, Spanish, etc. then, too? Anyway, I took it out. There never was a sizeable Polish speaking population in Greifswald. It would make sense to add the Swedish form, but I don't know it.

To answer your question, Gryfia was a Pomeranian city that had belonged to the Kingdom of Poland before 1199, by all means the Danish monks were NOT the first ones to have settled here, I'm not certain anyone in Germany believes that Greifswald was only settled in 1199 or that it is originally a non-Slavic town, most people in Greifswald are aware that the city had a clear Slavic Pomeranian history. This German propaganda is way beyond belief, see the article: Dukes of Pomerania for more. The town was germanized and lost its slavic feel around 1295, the same goes to Wołogoszcz ( Wolgast), Dymin ( Demmin ) and Bardo ( Barth ). As you know Pomerania was a fief of Poland therefore these territories had belonged to Poland at one point. I am not saying that Polish name has to be included but there is a clear feeling among some Poles that the some of the Vorpommern territory incl. Gryfia, Wołogoszcz, Strzalowo ( Stralsund ) should have been given to Poland in 1945 as well. Germans can try to revert history but these territories have a clear Pomeranian past and therefore are very dear to some Poles. VicFromTheBlock

That is the largest nonsense, which I ever read. Here is a Polish nationalist at the work! Muggmag 11:04, 11 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Don't you think that "communist dictatorship" is a bit biased? I mean the PDS as the successor party of the SED still gets a seizable proportion of the vote from Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, so clearly, at least some people must have liked it. I suggest substituting it with something slightly less value-ladden. Freddie

I concur with Freddie, and note that those who have written this article show absolutely no interest in its Nazi history. Google Greifswald Nazi to find 63,000 pages with references to that subject. When I have time, I will try to summarize some of that history. In the meantime, this is a glaring omission, showing extreme bias --and blinders --- in this article. Skywriter 21:47, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Considering there was no "near melt-down" in 1989 and it thus could not have been the reason for shutting down the powerplant, I took out that sentence. Greetings -- Ms.Griffin 22:22, 10. Juli 2007

Illustrations

The images are very repetitive. I'll clear some, according to the German article. Feel free to suggest new photos. Ahoi Horst-schlaemma (talk) 18:05, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Is it a city?

Why is this place described as a city? Does it have official administrative status as a city? Because it's home to just one-third the number of people as Germany's 50th most populous city/town, it really does seem like a town and not a city.Rayman60 (talk) 19:47, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Greifswald. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:02, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]