Talk:Hawaiian crow

Birds Mid‑importance

Hawaiian crow is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Hawaii C‑class Mid‑importance

	Hawaii portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hawaii, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hawaii on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HawaiiWikipedia:WikiProject HawaiiTemplate:WikiProject HawaiiHawaii articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Extinction High‑importance

	This article is a part of WikiProject Extinction, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on extinction and extinct organisms. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.ExtinctionWikipedia:WikiProject ExtinctionTemplate:WikiProject ExtinctionExtinction articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Untitled

I removed the following:

It has been supported that the name was given to the crow by the ancient Greeks that had visited the area, because of its distinctive cry. Alala for the ancient Greeks was a deity, daughter of Ares (Mars), God of war and she represented the ancient Greek warcry as mentioned by Pindarus.

How did the Greeks get to Hawaii? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bittercitrus (talk • contribs) 18:45, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conservation status

Should I update that conservation status to CR? They just released 6 into the wild! I added that on and added a reference! You can find it in the article! Pancakes654 22:12, 27 September 2017 (UTC) Pancakes654 22:12, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

You most definitely should not, and if you still don't understand why, you really really should keep your fingers off all IUCN-related material: You don't get to guess, deduce, make up or pull out of various orifices any IUCN classifications - they are either officially assigned by the organization or we don't report them! - Apart from that (and based on my unreferenced recollection), in case of reintroductions a downgrade from EW status is only applied if a reproductive population is re-established, which cannot be demonstrated here for at least several years. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 10:56, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Inconsistencies in the spelling and capitalization of ‘alalā

1. I have added the macrons to the few cases that did not have them (‘alala > ‘alalā).
2. Some write okina with a template (ʻalalā), others write it by typing the symbol directly (‘alalā). Which one to choose?
3. In the entirety of the article, the word is not capitalized (‘alalā), but in the intro, it is (‘Alalā), even though it's not at the beginning of that sentence. Spanish and Italian Wikipedias have made the same choice... Why?--Adûnâi (talk) 14:52, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]