User talk:StephenDawson

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- Francs2000 | Talk [[]] 16:43, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Welcome to you

Welcome to Wikipedia Stephen. Not been here long myself. --Eddie | Talk 11:30, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Seven Sisters

Please visit the Seven Sisters, Sussex and review recent versions. A strange foreigner (ie. not raised in Cumbria - I was - were you?) has decided - goodness knows why - that the article only needs one picture. If you put the other one back rather than me it will add weight to the argument. -- RHaworth 12:25, 2005 Apr 7 (UTC)

The hill infoboxes

Anything to add to the discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Mountains/General#From_Template_talk:Infobox_british_hills_.28no_image.29 as regrds the infoboxes we use for hill articles? Grinner 09:44, 26 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Wrekin

Thanks for the extra Mount Gilbert information and the photo of the summit.

If you know about local history, could you possibly help with the History of Shropshire article? Thanks again.

David.

Grand Union Canal (article merger)

According to the history, user:RHaworth did the nomination for merger. He is an experiences editor, so I'm surprised that he stuck the RtMg on it without comment. I suggest you put a message on his talk page inviting his reasons. --Concrete Cowboy 16:58, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pronounciation

I know this is probably impossible, but would it be possible to add a 'Pronunciation' row in the Welsh + Scottish hills infoboxes? I for one have no idea how to pronounce Liathach, Beinn Eighe, Cnicht or a lot of others and I'm sure there are lots of people who don't. This wikipedia is supposed to provide information on hills; shouldn't we tell them how to say them as well? Probably imposs though... --Mark J 17:06, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for River Lee Navigation

Hello, sometime ago you added a fair bit of content to River Lee Navigation. As you may be aware, we are currently trying to improve Wikipedia's accuracy and reliability by making sure articles cite the sources used to created them. Do you remember what websites, books, or other places you learnt the information that you added to River Lee Navigation? Would it be possible for you to mention them in the article? Thank you very much. - SimonP 15:21, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Swinside stone circle

Just seen you've removed the mention of Swinside stone circle from the Swinside article. I must admit I have never visited the area, so if the stone circle is not near the hill, where is it? I'd like to be able to reintroduce the information somewhere. Thanks for spotting the mistake!
Best wishes, David Kernow 17:00, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's at SD171881, about 35km south of Swinside. In fact, looking at a map, I see it is on the slopes of a fell called Swinside Fell, but not the Swinside in question (and probably even less well known). I agree it would be good to re-include the information somewhere. Best wishes, StephenDawson 17:07, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; I now see from an internet search that at here the circle is associated with Broughton-in-Furness. Alternatively, I see there is no mention of Swinside Fell in the List of fells in the Lake District, so I could add it to the list and create a stub article that includes the stone circle info. What do you think? David 17:24, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't particularly associate Swinside/Sunkenkirk with Broughton myself, though they are nearby, but others may do. There is also a case to include reference in Black Combe, as Swinside Fell is part of the Black Combe massif. Or there is a fair case to be made for giving the stone circle it own page – see Castlerigg stone circle as another stone circle in the Lake District, not much more impressive in my humble opinion, though much more visited. On the whole, I'd go for a separate page for now with links from Broughton and Black Combe: Stoupdale Head and Stoneside Hill might well one day get pages as Outlying Wainwrights, but I would be doubtful that Swinside Fell has enough about it to merit inclusion. StephenDawson 21:49, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have some photos on my website I would be happy to contribute to such a page, but I think they are too much holiday pictures rather than appropriate for this page. I must visit the circle again soon. StephenDawson 21:58, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Having looked at the map [1] I would say the stone circle is near (the hamlet?) Swinside, which in turn appears to lie beside the steepest side of Swinside Fell ~~– presumably the fell/marilyn featured in the current Swinside article...?~~ If so, how about keeping the article as "Swinside" and start from a mention of the hamlet/dwellings before moving out to the two significant features nearby, viz. the fell and the stone circle? Yours, David 23:52, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
PS If a free-use licence is no problem, upload your photos without family to the Commons – they're good!

I've now moved the previous Swinside article to Swinside (Derwent Water) and created a stub for Swinside in southern Cumbria which reintroduces the stone circle information. Hope that's okay. Best wishes, David Kernow 23:06, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Swallows and Amazons series

Hi. Thanks for sorting out the links to the series pages from the books after I moved the page. I remembered I hadn't done it and went to make the changes, only to find they'd been done! Thanks again. (BTW I like the photos on your user page!). --G Rutter 17:25, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem – glad to help! StephenDawson 21:49, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Gummers How from Lakeside.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Gummers How from Lakeside.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stan 05:55, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

K&A canal

Ages ago yu added some content to the article on the Kennet and Avon Canal. I've done some work on this and the Locks on the Kennet and Avon Canal and have put them both up for featured status see discussions at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Locks on the Kennet and Avon Canal & Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Kennet and Avon Canal/archive1. I'd be grateful if you had anything you could add to either article or the discussions. — Rod ^talk 12:06, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wyrley and Essington Canal

Hi. I noticed you added details of the branches on the Wyrley and Essington, and quoted the length of Lord Hay's branch as 14m (22.5km), but I suspect it should be 1.4m (2.2km). I've left a note on its talk page, but thought you might see it sooner here. Any thoughts? Bob1960evens 17:58, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:New Gauge.jpg

File:New Gauge.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:New Gauge.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:New Gauge.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:53, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, StephenDawson. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, StephenDawson. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, StephenDawson. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]