Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Jarkoff

Looks like vanity. Maybe his page is worth an entry, but not the guy himself. Caught this when the redirect jark was created. --Shibboleth 22:30, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)

• Upon further examination, probably not vanity but users from his page writing up an entry about him. The site looks pretty large and probably shouldn't be deleted, but I still think this guy is not important enough. --Shibboleth 22:39, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)
• Much as I pity anyone stuck with that name, not notable. -- orthogonal 00:59, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: His family is 33 years old? Per nomination, page might be worthy, but not the person. Geogre 12:43, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
• His site's rather well known and dissevering of a few lines, but the person? I think not. He's, frankly, not encyclopedia material at this point in time. Perhaps in 10 years if deviantART is still around, but for now, we don't need this. Merge anything useful and delete. -- Bobdoe 23:42, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)

thats like saying the telephone is worth an entry but not alexander bell