Talk:Cult Awareness Network

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cult Awareness Network article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 90 days

Cult Awareness Network was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 12, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed

Scientology Mid‑importance

	This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.ScientologyWikipedia:WikiProject ScientologyTemplate:WikiProject ScientologyScientology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion: New religious movements Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by New religious movements work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

The Arc of Eden cult

I have a nephew that went missing four days ago and was in contact with this cult. Do you know anything about this cult? 2600:8804:8753:A600:DCE9:3CDE:54E3:6984 (talk) 17:23, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this talk page is for discussing improvements to the Cult Awareness Network article. If you're seeking information for a specific group, perhaps consult with the International Cultic Studies Association. Their website can be accessed here. If you want to talk more about this subject, you can use my talk page instead of this one. --Jacquesparker0 (talk) 17:13, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV issues

The "the Church of Scientology, an American cult" remark seems a little out of place. Wikipedia's article on Scientology notes that it's "variously defined as a cult, a business, or a new religious movement"—yet, here, a definitive stance seems to be taken.

Similarly, out of curiosity, is there in-source support for calling Linda Thompson a conspiracy theorist? The use of brackets has me somewhat concerned that that's original research.--96.94.213.161 (talk) 20:45, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@96.94.213.161: See article Linda Thompson about the added qualifier (conspiracy theorist); I think that label is pretty well-documented. I lengthened the quote to the full sentence from the source. Re Dean Kelley, per this source, "He championed the rights of such controversial groups as the Branch Davidians, the Church of Scientology and the followers of the Rev. Jim Jones, who died in a mass suicide. He maintained that "one man's cult is another man's religion.""

As to the "cult" label, keep in mind that the Church of Scientology was the main "cult" according to CAN. I tried to re-word the lead to clarify that. Grorp (talk) 04:32, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if "the irony being" is entirely encyclopedic. How about: "Church of Scientology, which CAN had previously labelled a cult"? My larger concern about Thompson isn't so much that the description isn't accurate, but that the source didn't reflect that descriptor. That is, I think the brackets are only appropriate if the source itself calls Thompson a conspiracy theorist, otherwise it gives the impression that it did.--96.94.213.161 (talk) 17:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I added two quotes about the 'irony' matter from two different Lewis publications which were cited with google books URLs (good books is notoriously unpredictable in what they will show). One of the Lewis sources actually uses the concept of irony in "in an ironic twist, some of CAN assets were sold..." Also, the new citation I added yesterday describes the concept without using the word... as in "Group that once criticized Scientologists now owned by one" and "In a bizarre twist of fortune, the organization that was once the most vocal critic of Scientology is now owned by a member of the controversial church," and other content in that source. Grorp (talk) 01:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CAN and the definite article

Do sources predominantly refer to the topic organization as "CAN" or "the CAN"? The article jumps back and forth. The usage should be consistent within this article. Carguychris (talk) 13:25, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since it is pronounced "can" like a "can of beans", and not "see-ay-en", then typically in speech it would be "CAN" or "the Cult Awareness Network". If someone is typing "the CAN" then they are either incorrectly reading it in their head as "the Cult Awareness Network", or they are pronouncing it "see-ay-en". ▶ I am Grorp ◀ 08:15, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Broadly speaking, you are correct, but common usage also comes into play. For instance, the Women Airforce Service Pilots is commonly referred to as "the WASP". (That said, the Wikipedia article jumps back and forth between "WASP" and "the WASP" to some degree.) Carguychris (talk) 14:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]