Talk:32-bit computing

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 32-bit computing article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is based on material taken from the Free On-line Dictionary of Computing prior to 1 November 2008 and incorporated under the "relicensing" terms of the GFDL, version 1.3 or later.

Untitled

during which time still doesn't really roll of the tongue, ne? Maybe it still needs some more refrasing. We are trying to get accross that:

During an extended period of time mostly 32-bit consumer computers were fabricated.
That 32-bit is a designation for the collective of those computers.

Shinobu 21:11, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I agree. I dislike it. It sounds like corporatese. Changing to "in which" here is enough to fix it. --Shlomital 12:52, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect logic

The previous author tried to make a convoluted connection between 4 billion bits and 4 GB of Random Access memory which is completely incorrect and will confused people.

108.17.109.131 (talk) 14:42, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

32-bit applications for Windows 95/98

Windows 95 and Windows 98 weren't "applications", they were operating systems with a mix of 16-bit and 32-bit code. They supported both 16-bit (DOS and Win16) and 32-bit (Win32) applications. Guy Harris (talk) 19:01, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

32-bit applications for Mac OS

Mac OS supported applications with at least 24-bit pointers, and later versions supported applications with 32-bit pointers; the 68000 and all later 68k processors, and the PowerPC processors, supported 32-bit arithmetic as well, so the apps for the Mac weren't 16-bit apps. Guy Harris (talk) 19:01, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For example, Office 95 was available in 32-bit form[1]. Guy Harris (talk) 21:46, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adding to the History of 32 bit

This article is kinda short, someone should add a part on when 32-bit first became created & common & what kind of results that had on computers. T97π (talk) 04:13, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"When 32-bit first became created" - that was at least 1964, and may have been before that. Interestingly, it had fewer bits per word than IBM's previous line of mainframe computers. Guy Harris (talk) 04:29, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And the main effect the 32-bitness of S/360 had on computers was that it popularized the 8-bit byte, although that was not just a consequence of its 32-bitness, it was also a consequence of it using byte addressing. That byte size was adopted also by a number of 16-bit byte-addressable processors, such as the PDP-11. Guy Harris (talk) 07:43, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is the lead invisible for anyone else?

I click Edit, and it's just not there. But "{{N-bit|32|(4 [[Octet (computing)|octets]])}}" is. Unless it's just me, someone should fix that. InedibleHulk (talk) 01:58, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The first two sentences of the introductory paragraph come from the {{N-bit}} template. Guy Harris (talk) 02:30, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Needlessly complicated. Fancy, though. Thanks. InedibleHulk (talk) 04:58, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]