Talk:Tokyo War Crime Trial

The site this entry came from states "VIGOROUSLY UPDATED UNTIL JAPAN FORMALLY APOLOGIZES". ( Couldn't find a ref to copyright ). Seems to me there are many claims in this article without supporting evidence. They may be accurate, but also may not be. The promise to vigourously update until receiving an apology seems less than objective to me. Moriori 22:57, Apr 16, 2004 (UTC)

The only thing I see which is a statement of opinion in the article is: "One radical theorist: Okawa". Everything else is from the trial record. [1] --69.133.46.77 19:38, 23 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

The message NPOV removed for two reasons: (1) Only factual accuracy may be questioned here, since presented are facts, not opinions. (2) No opposing view presented here in "talk". One has a right to question any and all articles, but one cannot litter them with "disputed" messages without solid evidence. Mikkalai 18:26, 25 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

International Military Tribunal for the Far East and Tokyo War Crime Trial Should be merged .Mikkalai 18:30, 25 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]