Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David M. Baker

David M. Baker was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

This is somebodie's resume. Not notable. --Ld 06:08, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)

• It's a bit more complex than Ld describes: it's a CV and also an article ("all rights reserved") "reprinted with permission" from a journal, and some extra stuff in very unencyclopedic, puffy prose. Delete, because other courses are more complicated. (There may be salvagable bits within it, but that's all too much trouble.) Incidentally, at 06:35, 2004 Dec 20, 24.208.174.105 stripped the VfD notice from it; I reverted. -- Hoary 06:54, 2004 Dec 20 (UTC)
• Delete. --fvw* 08:17, 2004 Dec 20 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, looks like a copyvio and if it isn't, resumes aren't encyclopedic. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|^(talk)]] 08:47, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete. Resumecruft. Gamaliel 08:50, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete: DCEdwards1966 20:22, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)
• Delete as CV, vanity. Wyss 00:06, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
• Delete as CV, vanity, and possible copyvio. Alphax (talk) 04:52, Dec 22, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.