Talk:Lexical definition
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Someone more familiar with the computing usage is encouraged to edit this and expand (or correct) the bottom portion... Mindspillage 05:06, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Improve this article
[edit]Hi, I’m completing a university course on Wikipedia and would like to make the following recommendations for this article. I recommend the addition of the headings 'Usage' and 'References'. I also recommend the addition of two resources, first [1] and second [2] (Oxford Reference combines about a million entries from their Dictionaries, Companions and Encyclopedias).
--MeerkatShadow (talk) 05:45, 18 September 2018 (UTC).
References
Categories:
- Stub-Class Linguistics articles
- Unknown-importance Linguistics articles
- Stub-Class applied linguistics articles
- Applied Linguistics Task Force articles
- Stub-Class philosophy of language articles
- Philosophy of language task force articles
- Automatically assessed Linguistics articles
- WikiProject Linguistics articles
- Stub-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Stub-Class logic articles
- Low-importance logic articles
- Logic task force articles
- Low-importance philosophy of language articles