Talk:Ge (unit)

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Japan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 16:37, October 31, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Measurement (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Measurement, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.MeasurementWikipedia:WikiProject MeasurementTemplate:WikiProject MeasurementMeasurement articles

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Gou Is Also Japanese Cup

A gou is the term used for a Japanese cup of 180 ml, which is definitely less than a cubic meter. Perhaps a disambiguation page is called for along with a "gou (Japanese cup)" article. Albanaco 20:46, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling

I would like to provide the following Google statistics:

Gou 180 ml has 78,100 results
Go 180 ml has 2,090,000 results
Go japanese unit 180 ml has 1,240,000 results
gō 180 ml has 233 results

Based on these results, I think it would be somewhat disingenuous to claim that macronless spellings are less frequently used. Vectro 15:41, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So, no reliable resources. Notice that a Google search is an example of an unacceptable source. All that your searches show is that some people do not know how to romanize long vowels. That should be easy to understand as it is more difficult for most to type diacritics. If you are not up to speed on the way it is done in professional publications, as well as here on Wikipedia, then a good start is WP:MOS-JA. The misspellings that you propose already seem to have redirects, which should be more than sufficient. If you are still opposed to it, then perhaps this page should be deleted. It already exists at Wiktionary, and if that is still a problem, then it can be moved to 合. 122.18.163.150 16:46, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looking further into your unacceptable source Google searches, many of the hits have absolutely nothing to do with this subject. I can not suggest a perfect filter, but those numbers are extremely inaccurate. Perhaps that is another reason why Google searches are unacceptable. Bendono 17:02, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unacceptable sources

From WP:SPS:

Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published, then claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason, self-published books, personal websites, and blogs are largely not acceptable as sources.

Lets review the citations: "Sake World Sake e-Newsletter"

Online, personal, non-reviewed content.
Not even consistent with their own name. They spell their name "eSaké", and yet write "sake".

How Many?

Personal website of Russ Rowlett
Non-reviewed content

Units database

Personal database of Adrian Mariano
Non-reviewed content.
Appears to have some Japanese ability as he tends to romanize long vowels as they are typed.
Inconsistent spellings. To name just one, "Kyuushu" instead of the hypothetical *Kyuushuu or even *Kyushu. Compare with Kyūshū.

Per WP:SPS, these are "largely not acceptable as sources." Especially as resources arguing for particular spellings.

WP:PRECISION suggests looking in "authoritative dictionaries" to resolve spelling conflicts. I looked in the following supposedly authoritative dictionaries:

Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary
Random House Unabridged Dictionary
Encarta dictionary

Neither "go" or "gou", used in this sense, were listed. (However, they all listed "go" for Go (board game), which is to be expected.)

So the words are not English. Next, per WP:NC, use WP:MOS-JA for Japanese, which is quite clear on the issue. It was even specifically brought up for discussion there almost a year ago. Redirects exist for these so-called "alternative spellings"; they do not belong in the article.

WP:PROVEIT states: "Do not leave unsourced information in articles for too long". This issue has been going on for almost a year now. Without even a single authoritative, verifiable dictionary, this mis-information needs to be removed. Bendono 13:39, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]