Talk:Oakley, Inc.

Fashion Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Skiing and Snowboarding Mid‑importance

	Sports portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skiing and Snowboarding, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of skiing and snowboarding articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Skiing and SnowboardingWikipedia:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingTemplate:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingSkiing and Snowboarding articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Everything after the first two lines is extremely NPOV - it sounds like a press release from Oakley. I'm going to revert to the Sep 5 2004 version. --NegativeK 17:43, Jan 8, 2005 (UTC)

For such distinctly minor corporations to be encyclopedic, some history, some cultural context, some meaning beyond the mere fact of existence is essential. Wikipedia is not a Yellow pages. --Wetman 02:07, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Would it be suitable perhaps to list some of the more popular models, or media references to the glasses? Other possibilites would be lense technology or its military/swat use. For as much of a cultural icon as it is, it should have a somewhat more hearty article than a simple stub.--Alfador 06:23, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright vio

I'm reverting to the version of 13 September due to copyright vio: [1]. Edwardian 03:51, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Link to C5=

The link to the substance C5 goes to a disambiguation page, and nothing on the disambiguation page covers this substance. Should the link be removed? Harksaw www.wholesaleinchina.cc —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.22.141.253 (talk) 09:05, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Materials - Unobtanium?

Alright, this part of the article is a joke. Unobtanium is not a real material; but the guy that edited it into existance put in other parts that seem legit. Maybe (s)he got this from a different source, which had this in as a joke? Anyway, I think it should get taken out... but I don't have the guts to do it! Someone with a login? :P

it's their in-house name for a custom material they've made for grip surfaces. Superslash (talk) 10:18, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unobtanium

It isn't a material per sey, but it is what Oakley uses to refer to it's (nosepiece??) specific material, so maybe it should stay there? I would like to know what it is made from though. Flamejob 17:20, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some kind of rubber... we may never know the exact formula. Oakley likes to keep things like that secret.--Surfaced 17:40, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the article should reflect that unobtainium is a "joke" word used all the time and is not trademarked —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.145.107.87 (talk) 08:20, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is correct. The article currently implies that Unobtainium is an Oakley invention. It isn't; it's a word used by engineers to refer to a hypothetical substance or material that is required to make some design or invention possible. E.g. "We could make it work if we made the bearing out of unobtainium." MrDemeanour (talk) 09:03, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Oakley Logo.jpg

Image:Oakley Logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

template

I think the artcle have been expanded well enough. I vote on the template to be removed. Jpogi 15:19, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:OakleyIcon.jpg

Image:OakleyIcon.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 17:58, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:OakleyIcon.jpg

Image:OakleyIcon.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:24, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

all the pictures

do we really need to include a gallery of editors' sunglasses in this article? a few pics are enough to describe oakley's style. anything further is just vanity. 74.100.178.116 (talk) 03:58, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

eyewear and fashion company

i think the style of the companys sports and fashion products could be described as sci-fi robotic or dune (you know, the houses competing for spice and conquering the galaxy) imitation style. or super hero fashion style.

also miss the mention of other fashion sportswear, like sandals (check google for oakley smoke rings).80.98.114.70 (talk) 08:53, 24 April 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Oakley, Inc./Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Oakley was sold to the Luxottica Group on June 21, 2007 for approx. $2.1 Billion.

Last edited at 21:41, 12 November 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 01:39, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Oakley, Inc.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/19961224132136/http://www.oakley.com/ to http://www.oakley.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:33, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Oakley, Inc.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131112211926/http://www.moodiereport.com/document.php?c_id=1132&doc_id=14387 to http://www.moodiereport.com/document.php?c_id=1132&doc_id=14387

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:18, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sponsorship activities

Given the motorcycling-equipment origins of the company, it might be worth mentioning that since 2017 it has sponsored the MotoGP series' Italian motorcycle Grand Prix event, officially named the Gran Premio d'Italia Oakley. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 2.122.177.55 (talk) 18:49, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]