Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruger p97dc review

Ruger p97dc review was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

Nominated for speedy, but it doesn't meet the criteria. Nevertheless, should clearly be deleted. I've asked the author to merge relevant details into the proper articles. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 04:04, Oct 27, 2004 (UTC)

Agree w/ Meelar. Any relevent details should be merged, but the article should be deleted, not redirected. —siro χ o 04:50, Oct 27, 2004 (UTC)
Delete: It's a review. Hence it is incurably POV and an essay. Geogre 12:39, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete. A review, on an encyclopedia. 'Nuff said. Nadavspi | talk 01:18, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Wikipedia is not Consumer Reports. --Improv 19:34, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.