Talk:List of Singapore-related topics

This redirect is written in Singaporean English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, centre, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Lists

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles

Singapore High‑importance

	Singapore portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

comment

The sportspeople section (under people and under sports) are duplicated, but the content are not the same. - Privacy 10:18, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Not just for sports, there also duplications for artists, politicians etc. I feel that the easiest way is to put all people's entries into categories under "People". In this case, it is easier to search. --Vsion 09:40, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List is generated by Bot

This list is generated by a bot, based on category pages. It finds 345 Singapore-related categories and 2303 articles. If there is any error, suggestion, or request for update, please send me a message. --Vsion 06:22, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow...how does the bot do that?!--Huaiwei 12:20, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

These articles are listed on the category-pages, so the bot reads the page on Category:Singapore, extracts the data, and then does the same for the sub-categories and so on. Some entries previously in the list were removed, such as the MIT, other foreign universities, international organisations, etc, because these articles were not listed in any singapore-related category. Sorry about that. If you want to include them, I could fix it manually, but it would be easier to assign them to a category that is descendant to Category:Singapore, so that it is automated. The list of articles, ( as in List of Singapore-related topics by alphabetical order), should be useful. 2303 articles is alot, but it would be interesting to see how many are non-stub, with no cleanup/expand tag, etc. Will want the bot to do this as well. :D --Vsion 22:46, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh icic...so it wont be able to seach for Singapore-related articles which are not assigned a Singapore-related category?--Huaiwei 04:14, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That is correct. In the list, each section heading matches the name of a category exactly. For example, List of Singapore-related topics#Bridges in Singapore corresponds to Category:Bridges in Singapore, and the list of articles under that section is the same as that category. So, it relies on the New Pages Patroller to assign the Cats; Category:Singapore-X-stubs are also okay. Hmm, you raise an important point: what about the uncategorised articles, or article not categorised under Singapore? The problem is finding them. Any suggestion? --Vsion 04:59, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm.. this problem is more serious than I thought. Just found one article Archbishop Nicholas Chia, that was not categorised under Singapore. There are million+ articles in wikipedia, how to search for them? --Vsion 05:11, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose we just have to snoop around wikipedia more. :D Asking the bot to do a wikiwide seatrch would probably turn up thousands upon thousands of articles on any topic so long that the word "Singapore" appears on it. It is also by pure chance that I spotted East Coast Seafood Centre when writing about eateries in Singapore, and discovered obnoxious foreigners attempting to claim its non-notability! :D--Huaiwei 05:30, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is the bot still working? I don't see any recent bot edits at all. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 20:18, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

pls remove

pls remove the following temples under the 'Buddhist Temples' section becos those are taoist and chinese folks temple, NOT buddhist monasteries nor dharma centers. (btw, 'monastery' is a more appropriate name than 'temple' in buddhism)

   * Hong San See
   * Jin Long Si Temple
   * Tan Si Chong Su
   * Thian Hock Keng
   * Yueh Hai Ching Temple

Working on it where the bandwidth avails, thanks 林榮祥 05:11, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Some clean up

Yesterday and today I worked on this list article a fair bit and this morning I removed the clean-up tag, although the list still needs more work. Now at any rate it has an intro, which it lacked before, and in the headings I have removed the constant reiteration of "Singapore" or "Singaporean" which is redundant in an article like this which is about Singapore. Invertzoo (talk) 12:21, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The list is indeed still a little messy, meanwhile it is readable though 林榮祥 05:11, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Singapore-related topics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Replaced archive link http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:kN439jqgENMJ:www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/545725/Singapore+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk with https://web.archive.org/web/20120614104805/http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/545725/Singapore on http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/545725/Singapore

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:31, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of Singapore-related topics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110728155245/http://www.aljunied.edu.sg/main.asp to http://www.aljunied.edu.sg/main.asp
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111203050754/http://www.mai-edu.net/joomla/ to http://www.mai-edu.net/joomla
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110810185204/http://www.mwtai.edu.sg/ to http://www.mwtai.edu.sg/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Outline of Singapore with List of Singapore-related topics

Both are lists of topics relating to Singapore. List of Singapore-related topics, over the years have been become a long, almost unmanageable mess, while Outline of Singapore requires some updating. I believe content from both lists can be merged and trimmed. Personally, I would prefer the layout and organisation in the Outline of Singapore list, with certain links in their own topic list, offhandedly i.e. List of Buddhist Temples in Singapore. – robertsky (talk) 17:47, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with the idea, its almost identical and Outline of Singapore is basically a list of Singapore-related topics. --Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 07:32, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Robertsky and Justanothersgwikieditor: Perhaps the topics list should be merged into the outline, rather than the other way around, especially if the layout and organization of the outline is to be retained? Otherwise, would we have a standard outline with the wrong title?

Both of the pages are outlines, by definition, as each has a hierarchical structure. But, there is an ongoing naming conflict inherent in the set of "List of x topics"...

There are two types of topics lists on Wikipedia (based on how their contents are organized): outlines, and indexes. The former has topic-structured headings and the latter has alphabetical-letter headings.

The corresponding Outline of and Index of titles came about because there was a conflict in the prior naming scheme of "List of x topics", in that both types of topics lists competed for the same title. For example, you can't have a List of x topics that is an outline if there is already a List of x topics that is an index. Thus, some of the List of x topics are organized as outlines (with structured headings), and some are organized as indexes (alphabetical headings). It is essentially a deprecated naming convention, as the vast majority of topics lists have been being given the name "Outline of" or "Index of" for this very reason.

Another consideration is that, of the two sets of titles (Outline of x, List of x topics), the set of outlines is the larger, there being over 700 outlines, compared to around 165 "List of x topics" pages.

Comparing geographical article lists, there are about 200 that are named "Outline of place name", and about 50 named "List of placename-related topics". Almost all of the geographical Outline of pages follow the same organization/layout standard, and they also match the non-geographical outline standard in many ways, very much making them a part of a standard set.

Speaking of outline sets, here is the set of city outlines that the "Outline of Singapore" belongs to:

Note, that Singapore, Hong Kong, Macau, and Vatican City are city states, so their outlines share a lot in common with the country outlines.

Just some observations I thought you might want to think about. Sincerely, — The Transhumanist 08:29, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Given no further discussions, I have decided to enact a redirection of List of Singapore-related topics to Outline of Singapore. The List of Singapore-related topics, at its present state, is closer being a List of Singapore-related articles of which has been maintained and curated actively, thus serving a somewhat duplicated purpose of the related article list. Additionally, the Outline of Singapore article has been touched up with various wikilinks and external links updated. This redirection is done in reflection of the comment above by Transhumanist. – robertsky (talk) 05:21, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]