Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Edgar Allan Poe/archive2
This article has been subject to a peer review and a previous failed FAC. The article has been improved since the last FAC, and is deserving of another consideration for featured status. Harro5 04:46, May 24, 2005 (UTC)
- Am I missing something, the peer review request was just put up on May 23--nixie 06:27, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. Non-comprehensive, poor formating and referencing. Emily Dickinson is closer to FA-status than this is. Neutralitytalk 06:46, May 24, 2005 (UTC)
- Object: This is very interesting but has a poor layout, the links within the text would appear better as footnotes and too many very short paragraphs. Giano | talk 08:50, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
- Object. I agree with the above. The lead section should be longer, and the current layout and structure does not do the article's content justice. A good example for this is the Legacy and Lore section, which has too many small paragraphs and thus feels disjointed and hard to follow. Phils 15:59, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. Poor layout, not especially a comprehensive article either Jtkiefer 05:11, May 30, 2005 (UTC)