Talk:NetIQ

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

David Shephard at Micro Focus (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. (Previously User:NetIQ)

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Shephardd (talk · contribs) has been paid by NetIQ. Special:Diff/494312874

This page was listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion in May, 2004. The result of that discussion was to keep the article. For an archive of the discussion, see Talk:NetIQ/Delete.

Although purchased by Attachmate, NetIQ and Attachmate have not merged to become one entity in North America and the company operates as a separate entity and lists itself as An Attachmate Business. Outside of North America NetIQ has become a brand within the Attachmate portfolio. Shephardd (talk) 17:34, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since NetIQ is being aquired by AttachmateWRQ, to form (supposedly) "Attachmate-NetIQ", I will be performing a merger of this article and the AttachmateWRQ article as soon as the aquisition is complete. Tyrel Haveman 17:00, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article clearly needs to be deleted

This article seems to be nothing but an advertisement for NetIQ. Unless others object within the next couple of days, I plan to redirect it to Attachmate. Please speak up soon. Thanks. --Art Smart ^Chart/Heart 14:58, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, without objection, I'm redirecting this article to Attachmate. Thanks. --Art Smart ^Chart/Heart 22:13, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I object. NetIQ, although owned by Attachmate, is an autonomous company. Let's edit to be all fact, removing the 'advertising'. Outright deletion seems harsh. If no objection will reinstate and edit out what looks like spin Shephardd (talk) 15:46, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I also object. Have a look at the company's website: it still operates completely autonomously. Attachmate, Novell and NetIQ are owned by a private holding company, The Attachmate Group. I've now created the latter article to clear up the ambiguity. Scopecreep (talk) 16:03, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral point of view in "products and services" section

The text in this section is corporate-speak from marketing to the user, not in very neutral encyclopedic tone. Most of the references in this section seem to be based on promotional sources, closely associated with the subject. There might be a question of notability as well. A rewrite is needed. 80.221.159.67 (talk) 19:38, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The list of products listed in the article, and their descriptions, are more in line with other Wiki articles. Pi314m (talk) 04:02, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on NetIQ. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140415192719/http://www.networkworld.com/news/2006/042706-attachmate-buys-netiq.html to http://www.networkworld.com/news/2006/042706-attachmate-buys-netiq.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:04, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]